Sustainability of Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries

 

ACS Thematic Programming One-Day Symposium

Sugarcane, sugar beet and sweet sorghum

International and national guest speakers

Symposium book

 

The 239th American Chemistry Society -ACS

Spring 2010 National Meeting

CARB Division

 

San Francisco Convention Center

San Francisco, CA

Monday, March 22, 2010

 

Sponsors:

ACS Carbohydrate Chemistry Division

ACS Sustainability Theme Committee

American Sugar Cane League

V-Labs, Inc.

 

Dr. Gillian Eggleston

USDA-ARS-SRRC

1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd.

New Orleans, LA 70124

www.acs.org

TECHNICAL PROGRAM

 

Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries

 

Sugar and Sugar- Ethanol Industries I (Monday AM)

Sugar and Sugar- Ethanol Industries II (Monday PM)

 

 

I. Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries - Session I

(ACS - CARB Division)  Monday AM

Gillian Eggleston, USDA-ARS-SRRC, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124                                                 

 

8:30AM      Introductory Remarks.  Dr. Gillian Eggleston, USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, LA, USA

 

8:35AM      Major Challenges and Changes in the European Sugar Sector. Geoff Parkin and Jan Maarten de Bruijn, British Sugar plc, Peterborough, UK 

 

9:10AM        Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries: The South African and Southern African Regions. Barbara Muir1, Paul Schorn2, Charles Kruger3, Martin Eweg4, Ruth Rhodes4 and Stephen Peacock2.  1Sugar Milling Research Institute, Durban, South Africa, 2Tongaat-Hulett Ltd, Glenashley, South Africa, 3Illovo Sugar Ltd, Sezela, South Africa, 4South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Mount Edgecombe, South Africa.

 

9:45AM      Technical Developments in Ethanol Production from    Energy Crops.  Giovanna Aita and Deepti Salvi, Audubon Sugar Institute, Louisiana State University, St. Gabriel, Louisiana, USA.

 

10:05AM    Cultural Practices for the Sustainable Production of Sugarcane for Sugar and Bioenergy.  Ryan Viator, USDA-ARS-SRU, Houma, Louisiana, USA.

 

10:25AM   BREAK

 

 

10:40AM      “Cracking the Nut” - Integration of Enzyme and Microbial Systems in the Depolymerization and Utilization of Lignocelulose for Sustainable Production of Ethanol and Co-Products. Sharon Shoemaker, California Institute of Food and Agricultural Research and UC Davis Energy Institute, University of California, Davis, California, USA.

 

  11:05AM      The Success and Sustainability of the Brazilian Sugarcane-Fuel Ethanol Industry.  Henrique Amorim1 and Jose Borges Gryschek2, 1Fermentec Ltda, Piracicaba, São Paulo State, Brasil, 2Brasmetano, Piracicaba, São Paulo State, Brasil.

 

11:35AM      Analysis of Mannitol as a Deterioration Marker in Sugarcane and Sugar Beet Factories.  Gillian Eggleston, Jessica Gober and Clay Alexander.  USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

 

12:00-2:00PM LUNCH

 

 

 

II. Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries - Session II

(ACS - CARB Division)  Monday PM

Gillian Eggleston, USDA-ARS-SRRC, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124

 

2:00PM           Sweet Sorghum Hybrids and Industrial Processing of Sweet Sorghum Into Ethanol.  Walter Nelson, Ceres Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.

 

2:20PM           Opportunities and Challenges of Sweet Sorghum as a Feedstock for Biofuel.  Sarah Lingle, USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

 

2:40PM           Liquid Sugars Produced in Sugar Refineries: Advantage of Large Central Units Serving the Competive and Sustainable Needs of the Food Industry.   Francois Rousset, Novasep Process, Miribel, France.

 

3:00PM           Value-Added Products for a Sustainable Sugar Industry.  Mary An Godshall, Sugar Processing Research Institute, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

3:20PM           BREAK


3:35 PM          Sugar Beet Pulp: A Sustainable Source of Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) and Other Polysaccharides. Marshall Fishman, Hoa Chau, Peter Cooke, David Coffin and Arland Hotchkiss.  USDA-ARS-ERRC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

3:55PM           Approaches to Raw Sugar Quality Improvement as a Route to Sustaining a Reliable Supply of Purified Industrial Sugar Feedstocks. 

                        John Vercellotti1, Sharon Vercellotti1, Gavin Kahn2 and Gillian Eggleston3.  1V-Labs, Covington, Louisiana, USA, 2Carbochem Inc., Ardmore, Pennsylvania, USA, 3USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

 

4:15PM           Sustainability of Low Starch Concentrations in Sugarcane Through Short-Term Optimized Amylase Processing and Long-Term Breeding Strategies.  Collins Kimbeng1, Marvellous Zhou1, Serge Edme2, Anna Hale3 and Gillian Eggleston4.  1School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, 2Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, Florida, 3USDA-ARS-SRU, Houma, Louisiana, USA, 4USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

 

4:35PM           Development in Sugarcane Agriculture That Affect Cane and Sugar Quality.  Benjamin Legendre, Audubon Sugar Institute, Louisiana State University, St. Gabriel, Louisiana, USA

 

4:55PM           ADJOURN

 

 

ABSTRACTS

 

Major Challenges and Changes in the European Sugar Sector, G. Parkin and J.M. de Bruijn, British Sugar plc, Sugar Way, Peterborough PE2 9AY, United Kingdom

 

Over the last five years, a number of changes have taken place within the European Sugar Sector mostly driven by the reform of the European Sugar Regime.  This Regime had been in place since 1968 and was designed to “maintain employment and standards of living for EU growers of beet sugar” by making the continent self-sufficient in sugar production.  This presentation highlights the changes that have taken place to the Regime and how the Sugar Industry within Europe has altered to meet the new requirements.  Sugar Beet Growers and Processors are examining alternative strategies, resulting in new R&D initiatives, to ensure the stability and continuation of the industry in the future.  These have included Biofuel production, greater power generation involving CHP plants, alternative fuel sources, product diversification, and refining of imported cane sugar.  These initiatives will illustrate what a European sugar producer could be making and using in the near future.

 

 

Sustainability in the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries: The South African and Southern African Regions, B.M. Muir1 , P.A. Schorn2, C. Kruger3 , M. Ewig4, R. Rhodes4 and S. Peacock2. 1Sugar Milling Research Institute, UKZN-Howard College Campus, Durban 4041 RSA, 2Tongaat-Hulett Ltd (TEG), Private Bag 3, Glenashlesy 4022 RSA, 3Illovo Sugar Ltd (Sezela Mill), PO SEZELA 4215 RSA, 4South African Sugarcane Research Institute, Private Bag X02, Mount Edgecombe 4300 RSA.

 

The South African (SA) sugar industry is well established with strong infrastructure and support systems.  The 14 sugarcane factories operate in the sub-tropical eastern and north-eastern regions; two research institutes are dedicated to the sustainability of the land, the manufacturing industry, and its people.  While sugarcane cultivation is slowly on the decrease, SA sugar companies are rapidly expanding into southern and central Africa, already regenerating and reinforcing sugar establishments all the way to Kilombero in Tanzania, just north of the equator.

 

Margins in the SA industry have declined and co-products such as ethanol, electricity and chemicals are attracting renewed attention.  An oversupply of ethanol from oil-refineries and coal-to-fuel operations forced ethanol-from-molasses to maintain a low profile as potable bio-ethanol that is used mostly in the local beverage sector.  However, the availability of fertile land, excellent climatic conditions, low cost labor and preferential international markets in other African countries are rapidly stimulating investment.

 

 

 

Cultural Practices for the Sustainable Production of Sugarcane for Sugar and Bio-energy, R. Viator, P. White and R. M. Johnson, Sugarcane Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 5883 USDA Rd. Houma, LA 70360, Fax: 985-873-7894

 

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.), while traditionally grown for sugar production, can also be grown as a biomass crop for biofuels production.  Crop management practices will change depending on if sugarcane is grown for sugar or biofuels and will be influenced by climatic regions where the crop is grown.  For example, artificial ripening may not be needed if cane is grown strictly for its fiber as an energy source.  Degree of cultivation, dates of planting, date of harvesting, residue management, ratoon management, and land use allocation may also need to be adjusted depending on the end-use product.  If the entire plant including extraneous matter is harvested, harvesting logistics, soil fertility, soil health, soil compaction, and fertilizer application may be influenced.  Producing sugarcane in climatic zones where cane is not traditionally grown for sugar will entail germplasm screening, water conservation, and crop rotation.  Sugarcane cultural practices differ greatly form annual crops, such as corn and soybeans, because of its perennial crop cycle.  For example sugarcane harvest date affects carbohydrate partitioning to underground buds.  Any stress that affects these buds has the potential to reduce yields throughout the remaining crop cycle.  Yield optimization must always take into account effects on the subsequent ratoon crops.  We will discuss the similarities and differences in sugarcane and energy cane management and will highlight the need for managing this crop as a perennial and not as an annual crop.

 

 

Technical Developments in Ethanol Production from Energy Crops, Giovanna M. Aita and Deepti, A. Salvi, Audubon Sugar Institute, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 3845 Hwy 75 St. Gabriel, Louisiana 70776, Tel: 225-642-0135, Fax: 225-642-8790, gaita@agcenter.lsu.edu

 

The concept of energy crops, a renewable source of energy, has been around for decades.  It was not until the discovery of fossil fuels, a non-renewable source of energy, in 1859 that agricultural and forestry crops and their residues stopped being the primary source of energy.  Since then, fossil fuels have become the major source of energy generation and transportation fuels supplying 85% of the United States total energy demand.  According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ethanol produced from energy crops could displace as much as 25% of gasoline currently consumed in the United States.  Ethanol produced from energy crops mitigates many of the limiting factors food s associated with corn-ethanol or sugarcane-ethanol production such as competition with the food supply, availability of feedstocks and transport costs.  Nevertheless, the use of energy crops for ethanol production is still in the development stage.  Available processing technologies suffer from relatively low sugar yields, severe reaction conditions, large capital investment, high processing costs and great investment risks. 

 

 

Cracking the Nut” – Integration of Enzyme and Microbial Systems in the Depolymerization and Utilization of Lignocellulose for Sustainable Production of Ethanol and Co-Products, Sharon Shoemaker, California Institute of Food and Agricultural Research and Associate Director, UC Davis Energy Institute, University of California, Davis, California 95616, Email: spshoemaker@ucdavis.edu

 

This presentation reviews the enabling science that has advanced our understanding and use of lignocellulose as a feedstock for industrial production of ethanol and co-products. The phenotypic observations and experimental results of countless studies in past 40 years can assist in the rational design and interpretation of experiments using the tools of modern chemical biology, its “omic” approaches, multivariant analyses, high throughout screening and bioinformatics. A perspective of the past in the context of today and tomorrow, toward fully realizing cellulase-cellulose bioconversion in simultaneous-saccharification fermentation (SSF) systems is provided.  The presentation is dedicated to the life and memory of Dr. Raphael Katzen.

 

 

Sustainability of the Sugar and Sugar-Ethanol Industries, Henrique Amorim1 and Jose Marcos Borges Gryschek2 1Fermentec Ltda-Av Antonia Pazzinato Sturion, 1155 Piracicaba SP Brazil, amoirm@fermentec.com.br, Tel:551921056100, Fax: 551921056101  2Brasmetano-Av Eurico Gaspar Dutra, 230 Piracicaba SP Brazil, brasmetano@brasmetano.com.br

 


Sustainability is a concept that basically integrates economical, environmental, and social aspects, that has frequently been applied to human activities in a changing world.  Even for natural products such as sugar or renewable energy products such as bioethanol from sugar cane, a life cycle analysis can show how intensive and effective the processes are for their production.  For this analysis, it is necessary to evaluate all the demands and relationships amongst the cycle components, e.g., soil occupation; water consumption and conservation; fertilizers, chemicals to control pests, and other sub-products applied as a fertilizer source, and residue destination.  In the next step of processing the raw material, many others aspects have to be considered, e.g., type and quantity of energy and water consumption, characterization of many accessory products such as lubricants, antibiotics, detergents, and additives; liquid, solid, and gaseous emissions and their control and destinations; and the end-use of these products by consumers.  When considering natural and renewable products, more than a hundred aspects may be considered if these products are to be environmental friendly, safe, potential solutions to reducing and controlling global warming, and sustainable in the market place.

 

 

Analysis of Mannitol as a Deterioration Marker in Sugarcane and Sugar Beet Factories, Gillian Eggleston, Jessica Gober, and Clay Alexander, SRRC-USDA-ARS, 1100 Robert E. Lee Boulevard New Orleans, LA 70124, USA, Tel: + 1 504 286 4446 Fax: + 1 504 286 4367, E-mail address: gillian.eggleston@ars.usda.gov

Better control of sugarcane and sugar beet deterioration will contribute to the sustainability of the sugar industry. Mannitol, formed mainly by Leuconostoc mesenteroides bacteria, is a sensitive deterioration marker of both sugarcane and sugarbeet deterioration that can predict processing problems. An enzymatic factory method that is rapid, simple, accurate, and inexpensive is now available to measure mannitol in consignment juices at factories, and recently precision was improved to measure low mannitol concentrations in juices and other sugar products as well. A strong polynomial relationship (R2=0.912) existed between mannitol and haze dextran (a-(1→6)-a-D-glucan) in sugarcane juices obtained across a 3-month processing season at a sugarcane factory. Mannitol concentrations are typically higher than concentrations of antibody dextran, which indicates (i) the usefulness and sensitivity of mannitol to predict sugarcane deterioration from Leuconostoc and other bacteria, and (ii) the underestimation by sugar industry personnel of the relatively large amounts of mannitol present in deteriorated sugarcane. Greater than ~250 ppm/Brix of mannitol in sugarcane juice predicts downstream processing problems, but this threshold value may vary from region to region. The increasing awareness of how mannitol detrimentally effects processing, e.g., crystallization, is fully discussed.

 

 

 

Sweet Sorghum Hybrids and Industrial Processing of Sweet Sorghum into Ethanol, Walter Nelson, Ceres, Inc., 1535 Rancho Conejo Bovlevard, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, Tel: 805-376-6548, Fax: 805-410-0503, Email: wnelson@ceres-inc.com

 

Genomics-based plant breeding and biotechnology offer the opportunity to make game-changing improvements to non-food, low-input energy crops being developed for next-generation biofuels and biopower.  Combined with compositional analyses, this suite of technologies makes it possible to optimize not only yield-influencing traits such as plant architecture and flowering time, but also composition and conversion characteristics for various process technologies.  Thus, improved cultivars have the potential to produce not only more biomass per acre, but more fuel or energy per ton for multiple downstream uses, including liquid transportation fuels, electricity, natural gas, and fine chemicals. Among the new crops being considered for next-generation biofuels, sweet sorghum has historically not received the same widespread attention as others, despite numerous advantages.  It is a high-yielding seed-propagated crop that produces large amounts of sugar and biomass with relatively low inputs.

 

 

Opportunities and Challenges of Sweet Sorghum as a Feedstock for Biofuel, Sarah E. Lingle, USDA-ARS Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA 70124.  Email: Sarah.Lingle@ars.usda.gov

 

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is a grass crop with thick stalks adapted to warm climates.  Sweet sorghum (SS) has a juicy, sweet stalk.  The juice can be pressed from the stalks, directly fermented or boiled down to make syrup.  The plant residue remaining can be burned to run the mill or cogenerate electricity, or used as feedstock for cellulosic ethanol.  SS has wide environmental adaptation, rapid growth, high productivity, relative tolerance to marginal growing conditions, and high concentrations of the easily fermentable sugars glucose, fructose and sucrose.  The sugars in SS start to deteriorate once the stalk is harvested.  Leaves and leaf sheaths are difficult to remove from the stalk.  They are a source of microorganisms, organic acids and starch.  Microorganisms deteriorate the sugars, organic acids react with the sugars when the juice is heated, and starch thickens during boiling. Ideas for addressing these challenges will be discussed.

 

 

 

Liquid Sugars Produced in Sugar: Advantage of Large Central Units Serving the Competitive Needs of the Food Industry, Francois Rousset, Novasep Process, Saint Maurice de Beynost 5, Chemin du Pilon, 01708 Miribel Cedex, France, Tel: 33-4-72-01-27-70, Fax: 33-4-72-25-88-99, Email: Francois.Rousset@novasep.com

 

In the present world economics, the prices of sugar have managed to remain very reasonable, thanks to continuous availability from large producers like Brazil, and sustained domestic sugar production in other producing countries.  In comparison, cereals whose prices have been very volatile in 2008, are considered now as more questionable raw material for the production of liquid sugars such as high fructose syrups. The production of liquid sugars (Sucrose or Medium Invert) at the Sugar Refinery is gaining a new recognition for several reasons:


                                                              Raw material available in large quantities at stable prices

                                                              Thanks to the proximity of the Sugar Refiner to the Food Industry, possibility to build large scale efficient central units of Liquid Sugars

                                                              Saving energy usage by avoiding the costs of crystallization, when supplying directly a liquid product ready to use

                                                              Flexibility from the Sugar Refinery for supplying endusers with crystalline, or liquid sugar in most cost-effective conditions

 

 

 

Value-Added Products for a Sustainable Sugar Industry, Mary An Godshall, Sugar Processing Research Institute, Inc., 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana 70124, Tel: 504-286-4329, Fax: 504-282-5387, Email: ma.godshall@ars.usda.gov

 

Sugar production, from both beet and cane, is energy and water-intensive.  In today’s social and political environment, industries strive to be environmentally sustainable and “green,” while maintaining profitability.  The sugar industry has three avenues for achieving these goals: improving the over-all efficiency of the process; expanding its market with a range of innovative edible products; and finally, entering into the 21st century’s bio-based economy by developing products to replace petrochemical-derived products.  The industry has done well with the first two of these, but has found barriers to exploiting the latter possibility.  This presentation reviews some of the industry successes with value-added products and the potential for further development in the area of bio-based products.

 

 

 

Sugar Beet Pulp: A Sustainable Source of Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) and Other Polysaccharides, Marshall L. Fishman1, Hoa K. Chau1, Peter H. Cooke 2, David R. Coffin 1 and Arland T. Hotchkiss Jr.1, 1Eastern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Crop Conversion Science & Engineering Unit, 600 E. Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038, 2USDA-ARS-ERRC-Microbial Biophysics Unit, Email: marshaII.fishman@ars.usda.gov, rose.chau@ars.usda.gov, phcooke@nmsu.edu, david.coffin@ars.usda.gov, arland.hotchkiss@ars.usda.gov

 

It is estimated that the extraction of sugar from sugar beets in the U.S. produces about two million wet tons of sugar beet pulp yearly.  The dry pulp of this sustainable material contains about 67% valuable polysaccharides. With the aid of microwave assisted extraction, we have extracted pectin, and two alkaline soluble polysaccharides.  The presence of fibers in the insoluble cellulose residue was revealed by atomic force microscope (AFM) images (Kirby et. Al., Food Biophysics 1, 163, 2006).  The cellulosic fraction was solubilized by allowing the residue to react with monochloroacetic acid.  Analysis of the solubilized residue (SR) revealed it contained a large fraction of CMC and a smaller amount of uronic acid.  AFM revealed that the SR was comprised of linear strands interspersed with spherical particles.  HPSEC of the SR with degrees of carboxy methyl substitution ranging from about 0.59 to 1.38 revealed linear molecules with molar masses ranging from about 1 to 1.6 x105 Daltons.

 

 

 

Approaches to Raw Sugar Quality Improvement as a Route to Sustaining a Reliable Supply of Purified Industrial Sugar Feedstocks, John R. Vercellotti1, Sharon Vercellotti1, Gavin Kahn2 and Gillian Eggleston3. 1V-Labs, Inc., 423 N. Theard Street, Covington, Louisiana 70433-2837, USA, Fax: 985-893-0517, 2Carbochem Inc., 326 W. Lancaster Avenue, Ardmore, Pennsylania 19003-1228, USA, Fax: 610-645-5501, 3Commodity Utilization Research Unit, USDA-ARS-SRRC, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., Bldg 001, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, Louisiana 70124, Fax: 504-286-4390

 

Demand for purified sugar is increasing while energy costs for a sustainable level of this product outstrips manufacturing technology.  Agricultural commodity delivery of sugar as an adequately refined raw material for manufacturing value-added goods demands that the highest yields of purified crystalline sugar be realized to be competitive.  Components in raw juice inhibiting the crystallization of sugar must be identified to achieve very low colorant values with highest pol of the crystals.  Micro- and nanoparticulate materials can foul sensitive surface properties of adsorbents such as activated carbons or resins.  Improved approaches to clarification, such as combined centrifugation/micro filtration or nanfiltration of sugar juices or syrups, permit more efficient decolorizing with solid adsorbents.  Lower quality sugars can thus be upgraded to permit isolation of acceptable product while sustaining more favorable energy utilization.

 

 

Sustainability of Low Starch Concentrations is Sugarcane Through Short Term Optimized Amylase Processing and Long Term Breeding Strategies, Collins Kimbeng1, Marvellous Zhou1, Serge Edme2, Anna Hale3 and Gillian Eggleston4, 1School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, LSU AgCenter, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA, 2Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, Florida 33438, 3Sugarcane Research Unit, ARS, USDA, Houma, Louisiana 70360, USA, 4Commodity Utilization Unit, USDA-ARS-SRRC, New Orleans, Louisiana 70124

 

Starch negatively affects the quantity and quality sugar produced.  Starch increases juice viscosity, reduces crystallization and centrifugation rates, impedes refinery decolorization processes, and occludes into sucrose crystals.  Alpha-amylase used to hydrolyze starch is a short term solution as the enzyme is expensive and not always efficient.  We surveyed a large collection of cultivars and wild Saccharum species as a prelude to selecting and breeding for low starch content in sugarcane.  Starch content varied among the cultivars and wild Saccharum species; it was generally higher among the wild non-sucrose producing species.   Although starch values decreased as the cane matured or after exposure to freezing temperatures, their relative rankings among genotypes did not.  Heritability values for starch were high and backcrossing from wild into cultivated germplasm lowered starch and increased sucrose content.  Therefore, sugarcane cultivars developed to accumulate low levels of starch represent a more economical and sustainable strategy to mitigate the negative effects of starch.

           

 

 

Developments in Sugarcane Agriculture that Affect Cane and Sugar Quality, Benjamin L. Legendre, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Audubon Sugar Institute, St. Gabriel, Louisiana 70776, USA, Tel: 225-642-0135, Fax: 225-642-8790, Email: blegendre@agcenter.lsu.edu

 

Sugarcane quality and sugar yield and quality are interrelated.  In many production systems, both agricultural and manufacturing, there is conflict between productivity in the field and sugar quality.  High productivity and/or throughput many times compete with high product quality.  However, quality can be influenced by ever-changing developments in sugarcane agriculture and manufacturing including the introduction of new cultivars, use of chemical ripeners, changes in cultural practices and harvesting systems and the introduction into an industry of new disease, insect and weed pests.  There developments differentially affect cane and juice quality and have a direct bearing on sugar quality.  Further, cane and sugar quality have taken on new meaning today with the vertical integration of many sugar operations from field to refinery to consumer.  The new refinery today is seeking very high pol (VHP) sugar (> 99.2 pol) and very low color (VLC) sugar (<2200 ICUMSA units).

 

 

For more information contact Dr. Gillian Eggleston at Gillian.eggleston@ars.usda.gov